Subscribe to Monitoring Matters RSS Feed

Monitoring Matters

by: Daniel Gelinas - Friday, August 28, 2009
It's the last weekend of August. It was 52 degrees on the shores of Sebago Lake (where I live in Raymond, Maine) when I got up this morning at 6:30. For the first time since they bloomed earlier this season, my morning glories hadn't yet opened. That means it's getting colder. That means summer (such as it was) is pretty much over. That also means it's time for me to pack my bags and head off to Verona, N.Y. for Rapid Response's Users Group. SSN's publisher Tim Purpura and I will hit the road together and partake of the Users Group, which Rapid promises "to be a 'don't miss' event for Rapid Response Dealers, with workshops, seminars, feedback forums, and top companies from all areas of the Security Industry." I look forward to meeting industry folks in attendance and touring the RR facility. I'm also looking forward to hopefully touring Rapid's EMT-staffed Life Safety Monitoring facility, which handles PERS monitoring for Medical Alarm Concepts. There is even going to be a talk by special keynote speaker, Space Shuttle pilot Colonel Richard Searfoss, which I'm looking forward to (I'm a science/space/sci-fi geek), and, though I don't golf, myself, there's even a golf tournament to cap things off. Overall, it promises to be a productive few days sandwiched between lots of windshield time, during which I'm sure Tim and I will argue over whose iPod takes precedence...
by: Daniel Gelinas - Wednesday, August 26, 2009
I was writing a story on Iveda teaming with mobiDEOS the other day, and I noticed in my interviewing the terms "cloud computing" and "in the cloud" and "cloud technology" were being dropped a lot. I had to be honest with myself and admit, while I kind of got the basic idea of cloud computing, I wasn't exactly sure what it meant, how it worked, and what kind of effect its advent would have on the security industry. The cloud, and cloud computing has been mentioned in a couple of SSN stories recently, and I felt it was time I educated myself. I found a well done article on the emerging phenomenon at Datamation. It gets into just what cloud computing is, how the emerging cloud is being shaped, and what ramifications it will have on numerous industries, including security. There's also a list of 85 cloud computing vendors battling it out for market share right now. Interesting stuff, and useful info with implications for both the physical and data security industries. Enjoy.
by: Daniel Gelinas - Monday, August 24, 2009
I was going through my email this morning when I came across a Google Alert claiming "Bay area officers weary of false alarms." I thought to myself, well there's some news... false alarms are wearisome? The link is from San Francisco Bay Area CBS affiliate CBS 5. There's a neat video report from one of the news anchors and what caught my attention was mention of a "Do Not Respond" list that the report asserts is taking hold in the area. The police interviewed in the spot are with the Vallejo, Calif. PD, where the Do Not Respond list was started 2 years ago, but other towns mentioned in the report include, Concord, Berkeley, San Francisco, Livermore, Fremont (where 99.7 percent of alarms are false, according to the report) and Palo Alto. Another thing that struck me about the CBS 5's news clip is the prominent parade of alarm company signage... There're yard signs and window decals from Bay Alarm, Edison Security, Brinks Home Security (CBS 5 couldn't be bothered to go and find a Broadview sign, it appears), and Morgan Alarm (a company without a website, it would appear) popping up right and left. The thing that's kind of funny is that, despite the plethora of security industry advertising displayed, CBS 5 didn't bother to talk to anyone from the security industry. Huh? If you're going to include all those advertising materials from the industry, shouldn't you at least make an attempt to contact them? I mean, I know the Westphals don't really talk to the press, but there must have been someone from one of the other companies who would have loved to talk to the media, right? Oh, actually, they did get a nice soundbite from a German shepherd, presumable guarding a location... Does that count? I've got emails out to some industry folks to see what their take might be. More on this later.
by: Daniel Gelinas - Friday, August 21, 2009
CenterPoint VP Ops & Biz Dev MJ Vance recently passed on some info on the St. Louis-based monitoring center's next big event coming up in October. The Communications Industry Expo will be held Oct. 7. Info and registration forms can be found here. The event is a great way to stay current on your CEUs and is preceded by the 5th Annual Alarm Association of Greater St. Louis Golf Tournament at Pevely Farms, which takes place on October 6. So drop MJ a line and get your training and your eagle on!
by: Daniel Gelinas - Wednesday, August 19, 2009
I came across this blog post in my Google Alerts this morning. Someone needs to give this guy a call and let him know how they can help him. I've only been covering the security industry for a little less than a year, but it seems to me that there has to be lots of options out there.
by: Daniel Gelinas - Monday, August 17, 2009
If you live in the Fort Lauderdale area and you've paid false alarm fines, you may have reason to expect a refund from the city. This story from the South Florida Times paints an interesting picture of residents and businesses being improperly fined and overcharged for false alarm runs, possibly for the last nine years. The potential reparations? Over $450,000, according to the article. This whole situation has the potential to get very nasty with forecasts of lawsuits if the financially strapped municipality (no offense Fort Lauderdale, but honestly, who isn't financially strapped these days... and if you weren't financially strapped, why overcharge your citizens in the first place?) doesn't refund the money to the residents and businesses who were improperly fined. I do not envy the powers that be in Fort Lauderdale. The article also links to an itemized list of all the overcharges.
by: Daniel Gelinas - Thursday, August 13, 2009
Just got an announcement from Dallas-based Monitronics. They're very excited to be celebrating their 15th anniversary this month. I guess in this economy, who wouldn't be excited to still be going strong after 15 years? According to the release:
since it's inception in 1994 as a small start-up, this alarm monitoring company has grown to nearly 700 employees and 600,000 customers.
Monitronics has celebratory events throughout the month of August, leading up to a company-wide celebration on Aug. 21. Monitronics' VP of marketing Mitch Clarke had this to say:
This month is an opportunity for us as a company to recognize our customers and our dealers and thank them for their loyalty. We strive to provide the best service to them day in and day out.
Congrats to Monitronics on their 15th birthday.
by: Daniel Gelinas - Tuesday, August 11, 2009
So my fearless editor Sam forwarded a release on to me from MobiDEOS (though the one linked here is from Iveda) about a partnership with Iveda Solutions that could allow just about anyone with a cell phone to enjoy interactive access to their cameras for 24/7 viewing from anywhere in world. Pretty cool stuff. Of course, my particular model of LG phone doesn't support MobiDEOS' MobileCamViewer, which makes it all possible. I mean, I wasn't really considering trying this whole thing out, since I don't have any surveillance cameras or CCTV systems at my disposal... Then I read that Webcams are included in this everyday Joe surveillance solution, and that the MobileCamStreamer could be downloaded for free. Running this, I could (if I had an iPhone) log onto my laptop at home, which I leave running all day, and see a view of whatever my built in Webcam is seeing... My laptop becomes a sort of low-cost surveillance system. pretty cool. Of course, being able to log on and see the person who breaks in to steal my laptop doesn't really aid me in any way... But if I want to spy on my family, then this is right up my alley. I'm working on a story about all of this, so keep your eyes open.
by: Daniel Gelinas - Thursday, August 6, 2009
The results of the most recent SSN Newspoll are in, and the results are interesting. What's even more interesting is sitting back in my comfy office chair and relaxing while reading through all the voter commentary. I thought you all might enjoy reading some of what the voters had to say about the summer-model, summer-model companies, codes of ethics, and the plight of the industry in the face of sometimes dishonest and pushy door-knockers. Sam and Martha discuss the poll results at ssnTVnews, as well. I've included below a sampling of comments that didn't make it into the story. I've decided to keep the comments herein anonymous... Enjoy. Here's a gentle and balanced take.
Some good, some bad, seems to vary with company and even with branch office in terms of how aggressive they are.
Some did not hold the door-knocker in high regard (note the ALL CAPS, which is the text equivalent of shouting).
I think all company owners who participate in door-to-door sales, a.k.a. stealing accounts, should be beaten with a wiffle ball bat.
Many voters focused on the real issue here, which is honesty, or lack thereof.
I don't think the ethics of the alarm companies are the issue, but those of the individual reps themselves. There are thousands of sales representatives out there every summer who do their jobs with integrity. Unfortunately, there are a few who feel they can get away with a little misinformation here and a promise they can't keep there. These seem like small things at the time, but eventually they grow into bigger issues and the next thing you know the company you work for and believe in is on the news below words like "SCAM" or "PREDATORY."
This came about because apparently some sales people were CLAIMING to be ADT reps..... and apparently a lie. I'm more concerned about other lies like "police will respond and be here in three minutes". Alarms are fine... but the limitations should be addressed honestly.
In burglar alarm companies, I understand why they do it, because it works. That doesn't make it right, but it is what it is. The real problem is people that run some Integrated Security Companies actually try to make their sales personnel try these same tactics as a way to generate sales of Integrated Card Access and/or CCTV Systems. One business owner in Carrolton, TX still does this to this day. Not only does it not work, it puts the sales personnel in a no-win situation.
We get numerous calls from customers and concerned citizens every summer regarding the summer sales companies that operate in our area. Many times these people feel they have been victimized by unethical salespeople (pushy, dishonest, etc.). I realize the companies don't necessarily train their employees to act in that fashion, but their sales model (how many accounts can we sign up in the shortest amount of time) encourages this kind of behavior.
One of the problems many addressed was the difficulty in policing the behavior of door-to-door salespeople.
We require all of our representatives to have ID cards from the police department which requires finger printing and background checking. We also require these reps to be honest but find this is very difficult and have had several terminated because of unethical tactics, lying, etc. We need a very strict code of ethics for field reps protecting dealers and companies and holding these reps legally accountable for misrepresentation, dishonesty, etc. As a group, door to door sales reps have a horrible reputation and can hurt this industry if they are not kosher!
I think the larger companies have difficulties in maintaining the integrity of the salespeople's presentation just by the fact that there are so many people in remote places to manage.
They need to undergo more training and be supervised a bit more. Many are great and have the best intentions but there are some that undermine the industry.
Certain companies with the door-to-door model talk a good game but don't take steps to police the tactics of their summer sales forces. Obviously, deceptive sales practices are tolerated in the field while corporate gives lip service to setting standards. I think the recent ADT lawsuits directly against the predators are a step in the right direction. Enterprising college students or not, they need to be taught a lesson.
It's greed all over again. Ever see a Doctor knocking on doors??? This industry has really gravitated towards the bottom feeding with fast talking, misleading salespeople who are NOT trained professionals!
Some people cut right to the chase and claimed the problem was not with door-to-door sales as a model, but with those who wielded the practice unethically.
I think Door to Door sales is a great model for building new accounts and creating industry awareness. There are many many salesman that are honest and work with integrity that do a great job promoting our industry.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with door-to-door sales - if the salesperson conducts their sales in an ethical manner. (see the NBFAA Code of Ethics)
I don't agree with door-to-door because people are often mislead. Some companies do this intentionally, others do not but the unfortunate part of it is that a lot of people don't realize that they are not getting as good of a deal as they are pitched. This has created a very negative stigma with regard to alarm companies. I have traditionally been involved with CCTV and access control systems but have had involvement with burg, for 23+ years on the integration side and I'm now on the consulting side of the industry. The alarm guys have always had this stigma surrounding them.
Door knocking is a good way to generate sales however when sales people are pushy and misrepresents themselves and the company they represent action should be taken. No company should build business on misrepresentation.
Door knocking is one of the oldest methods of sales in general. It only has a negative viewpoint when abused, just like any other sales or business solicitation method. It is not the sales method, but how that method is delivered that should be under ethics scrutiny.
Some voters pointed out other problems with door-to-door.
It does generate new accts. but most of these have a high attrition rate. It is a good thing only at the beginning.
Door Knocking is a great method of finding new clients. The problem is greed has created a situation where sales reps are taking customers from other companies, which is a tort...interference with contractual relations. The situation results in loss of client from the prior company, double billing issues for the subscriber, and then sales rep goes back to school in Utah and forgets about the people he screwed. Many times we hear, that the door knocker indicated they were from our company and were there to upgrade the system. Dishonest. The pattern is so wide spread, it could only occur with corporate encouragement.
Some focused specifically on the summer-model, claiming the practice damages the industry through casting a fly-by-night light.
Unfortunately, door-to-door sales people have given the alarm industry a bad name. Door-to-door sales is not bad, but the people doing it are! Why do people want to deal with a company that only sells in the summer? What about support and service? Is service a thing of the past?
The summer model companies that are currently operating have some very aggressive sales people. I'm not saying that they are all the same but the number of complaints about them is unsettling to say the least. The other thing about these sales is who is going to service these accounts once they have been installed? This type of selling gives the security industry a bad reputation. Most companies want to give their customers the best possible service but that doesn't seem to be the case with the summer model companies. Door-to-door sales when used properly is a good way to create some awareness and increase sales.
The summer program companies have not traditionally been companies that look into the future repercussions of their short term actions. With the evolution of that model, most of them are starting to learn hard lessons about long term attrition models and customer service. The bottom line is that if they don't spend the time and money to correct these issues the lawsuits filed by competitors and the regulations endorsed by municipalities will be of far greater financial consequence than their own training and diligence costs. Associations are typically ineffective at enforcing code of ethics violations.
Summer sales programs that behave like the "Music Man" blowing into town, making sales and vanishing into the night are not good for the industry; however, door to door sales conducted by a company with a permanent presence in the community are good for the industry.
Some claimed door-to-door should become a thing of the past.
It's really an issue of best practices. No sale can ever be successful unless it's approached as consultative. Pushy advertising makes little sense in the world of Web 2.0, where savvy consumers have access to information, research resources, and make decisions based on their needs, not the availability of a product or service. If a consumer wants security, they will seek out a company. That said, the most important aspect of this is to understand the selling of security. No system and no company can ever guarantee that a resident will be protected from crime. What's really being sold is the assurance of peace of mind. If a neighborhood feels that pushy sales people have infiltrated its sanctity, there goes any assurance of privacy, peace of mind, or security. Most view door-to-door sales as not just an inconvenience but a violation. In the end, the message conveyed is contrary to the service or product being pushed. Perhaps residents will end up purchasing security systems just to keep aggressive sales people from entering their property. One last thing; the more aggressive the sales tactic, the greater the perception of a company's desperation to sell, especially in uncertain economies. If the consumer believes that a security company is desperate or has hit hard times, then the consumer has little confidence in that company's solvency or financial security. We're in the 21st century now and our sales strategies should reflect that.
Home security is serious and private, and to let an unknown person in your home is wrong. Their action constantly damages the industry's reputation. Appointments should be pre-scheduled. I had one come to my door, he was a clever liar who had worked for another door to door company before. He said he made a lot of money doing this job and wanted me to pay twice what I already pay for my own system (I had to pry that out of him). He said his company would pay off my current contract. He and his installer were both unlicensed and misrepresented what company they were with. Sorry I can't comment further because of the lawsuit.
Door to door sales threaten public safety and violate privacy. People are becoming more scared of opening their doors to strangers, and for good reason. Home invasions are on the increase, and the public should be discouraged from opening their doors to anyone they don't know. I have a "No Solicitors" sign on my front door because I do not want my privacy invaded.
Some said: "Like it or not, the summer-model works."
The sales method from the summer model program is impressive, regardless of the opinion from alarm companies of traditional sales models. The introduction of high volume, low cost sales programs, introduced many years ago, caused a similar outburst among traditional organizations. The industry is evolving, causing new players to evaluate the opportunity and setting the stage for new sales delivery systems for alarm systems. I am sure in the coming years, another outside player will impact the industry with new technologies and point of sales mechanisms that will cause other traditional alarm companies to sit-up and take notice.
Door to door sales has always been, and will be for a long time, the most productive way to generate new accounts. Every successful sales person (on any level) in this industry makes "cold" calls. That being said, it is never acceptable to mislead or push your customer into purchasing a home security system that is not right for them.
Some felt door-to-door was good in that it helped end users to be proactive about security before a loss occurs, and puts the idea of security in their head.
As long as compliance measures are met by the company, I think that particular method of customer acquisition is great. Exposure to the need for security is spread throughout the neighborhood whether or not someone decides to become a customer and if anything, it gets people to think about security proactively rather than the unfortunate trend in our industry for customers to only buy a system once they have experienced a burglary. People don't usually pursue or research alarms until a crime happens to them or someone close to them. If a door knocker is able to help a family obtain a system they wouldn't have otherwise obtained then I say, AMEN!
The door to door model obviously works for the companies that adopt that model. The summer companies and even the ones that are here year round that use it are extremely aggressive to the point of using untruths to get people to violate an existing contract with their current company and switch over to their services. I think that in the long run they probably create more business for the legitimate alarm company, because the customer will have an alarm in their home, and eventually they will find a good alarm company to do business with.
Some voters pointed out the positive side of door-to-door sales.
I think with most types of media you are generally hearing the negative feedback. Some people get very bugged by someone coming to their door to sell them something, especially when they are pushy. BUT you have to realize those are the only stories you are hearing. What you are not getting are the people that are grateful their home and family is protected because a young man or woman came to their door and wanted to help protect their family... Something they probably wouldn't have thought to purchase themselves.
I think door-to-door sales is a powerful way to start protecting families! Every home is different, every family is different, everyone's needs are different, and every situation is different. Thus we need to have people personally come door-to-door and really get to know the people that the alarm company will be protecting. The business needs to run this way, so we can specifically meet the needs of every single person, and by doing so, the door-to-door sales people, the alarm companies, and especially the customers will know their home and family is always safe, and protected! Thank you to everyone involved in this wonderful door-to-door sales program!
I feel that door-to-door sales is a great way to for people to learn how an alarm system can protect their family. It is a completely different experience to hear someone explain the system, rather than read about it.
I think that it is very good. I have been in the shoes of the reps that do go door-to-door and i was able to help some people that otherwise would not have known what was out there. I think it is a very good tool for a company and it also helps protect more families. After all, isn't that what we in the alarm industry are all about.
To some, the theme should be caveat emptor.
It's good if you have the right people working for you. people that are dishonest don't need to work in this industry. on the other hand the consumer needs to be smarter about what they are getting themselves into. people get into something that they don't fully understand b/c they didn't read everything and by the time they get wise to their situation they look for someone to blame for their stupidity.
I think alot of the bad press is due to customer being upset about the agreement and not having enough money to pay for it, not necessarily the sales. although, i do think there is a bit of dishonesty with the sales tactics used and that we should keep a better eye on our sales rep as should other alarm companies.
It is a great way to contact people and to protect families. On a business side of things, because of the impulsive nature of the purchase on the part of the customer there are a lot of people that experience buyer’s remorse. They then put the blame of the remorse on the sales rep that sold them the alarm. On the other side of things there is nothing better to know that a family is safe when they had no precognitive intention to buy an alarm; nonetheless they are experiencing the peace of mind and protection that a residential security system provides.
I think that door-to-door knocking can be the answer to prayers for some families. Unfortunately, no one in the media really cares about a happy family. News stations thrive on negative news, and focus on the extremely small percentage of people that are displeased with this method. The only people who are unhappy with door-to-door sales are those who haven't the backbone to simply tell the sales rep that they are not interested.
Again, the above has been only a small sampling of the comments received on the latest SSN Newspoll. Check the poll frequently and let your opinion be heard.
by: Daniel Gelinas - Monday, August 3, 2009
I just got a press release from The Protection Bureau. They've announced the recipients of the company's scholarships for the children of current Protection Bureau employees. This years recipients included: Michael Lynch, Heather High, Brandon Canty, Brendan Lynch, Faith Handley, Lindsay Urban, and Charles Lynch. The Protection Bureau's Keith M. Ladd passed away earlier this year. The Education Fund was established by Keith and his wife, Protection Bureau co-owner and CEO Mary Ladd, in 2005. Here's the release:
Exton, Pa.—The Protection Bureau Awarded scholarships for 2009 to the children of its employees. This was a bittersweet event since Mary Ladd, CEO made the presentation without co-owner Keith Ladd who passed away earlier this year. In light of the tenuous economic condition of the world today, the company is very proud to be able to provide this program to help this generation further their education. This is the fifth year that these awards have been distributed. The Education Fund was established by Keith and Mary Ladd, owners of The Protection Bureau in 2005 for the benefit of children of current employees who enroll in formal programs for post-high school education. “This project was one that was close to Keith’s heart. I know this is what he would have wanted and I’m very happy to be able to continue it,” stated Mary Ladd. Initially, an anticipated distribution of four awards per year (up to $1,000 each) were planned. Recipients are selected each June for the ensuing school year and these awards help to defray the costs of tuition and/or books. This year seven scholarships were distributed to families in the office for students attending local colleges and universities. A panel of three independent judges received the unopened applications and made the decision with no input from the company other than to verify eligibility of the applicant. These awards are entirely outside the control or influence of company management.
Congrats to all recipients.